Monica Foster interviewed by Tania Fiolleau about the Porn Industry. Monica Foster Porn Industry Whistleblower interviewed by Former Madam Tania Fiolleau of Save The Women Ministry.

Tania Fiolleau of Save The Women Ministry helping women out of porn, explaining the spiritual aspect of being in the Porn Business.

Part 1 
Tania Fiolleau Interviewing Porn Industry Insider / Porn Industry Whistleblower Monica Foster.





Part 2 
Tania Fiolleau Interviewing Porn Industry Insider / Porn Industry Whistleblower Monica Foster.





The Adult Industry Breaks your Spirit, Holds you in the Industry with Drugs and Violence. Whistle Blowers are gang stalked, internet mobbed, stalked, harassed and under constant threats and retaliation. Exiting Porn is nearly impossible. Speak Up, help those who want to Exit Porn, do so safely.

STOP Human Trafficking. STOP Supporting the Porn Industry.

Tania Fiolleau Research Links

Helping Women to Exit the Porn Industry

http://www.savethewomen.ca/

http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/about/

"Save The Women Ministry International is faith-based and dedicated to reaching out to adult industry victims offering emotional, financial and transitional support. We largely focus on reaching out to the adult film industry & prostituted & human trafficking victims abroad offering education and resources to victims of sex trafficking and violence in the workplace. Save The Women Ministry International also reaches out to those struggling with pornography addiction offering education and large doses of truth to recover.

Men and women addicted to porn need to hear it straight from the women who were there.
Save The Women Ministry also works to combat community deterioration due to pornography and sex trafficking through attempts to educate legislation about the illegally operating porn industry, to educate the general public and to toughen laws to protect women and children from modern-day slavery.

Warning: This web site contains large doses of truth about the sex industry for purposes of education. If you are 17 years of age or under please ask your parents for permission to view this web site, although statistics show the largest group for viewing online pornography is ages 12 – 17.

Because of the huge epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, illegal drug use and violence toward adult industry workers, Tania. Fiolleau Founded Save The Women Ministry International in 2009.

Tania Fiolleau a former human trafficking survivor of major abuse in the sex industry and former madam of four brothels and well over 500 prostitutes was diagnosed with Severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Through inner healing and redemption she found in Jesus Christ Tania has now become a major voice abroad defending the rights of victims across the globe."

Source of quote and more
http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/vision-and-mission/




"If I were to ask anyone, which of the known addictions he found most repulsive, his answer would probably be, “drug addiction.”  He would perhaps reflect the opinion of the majority. However, if we look at the afflictions that we can observe every day, many would turn us to revulsion.  Diseases, such as cancer, muscular dystrophy, influenza, and the rest of them, metamorphose the body into something we have a hard time understanding. Most of us are lucky to be on the outside looking in.

Nevertheless, some of us suffer from a much more devastating disease than those I just mentioned. This affliction does not transform your body, but it kills your soul. It is something that we cannot beat with medication, or surgery, or even cure. Only three percent of the “patients” diagnosed will escape the everlasting torment if we don’t do something about it. Ninety-seven percent will die at the hands of evil thoughts torment and despair.  Yet, some have deliberately contracted this disease and many were forced into it. Either way it is not a disease that one would want… a walk down sex lane.

Do you really believe that anyone force all of these woman to take her clothes off and have sex with a man she has never met before and will probably never see again? Yes and no. Some women are forced into prostitution through human trafficking and pimps, others through circumstances, the customs, or the station in life impelling her to take the plunge into the deep, bottomless pit of prostitution.

In most communities of this world, women are not born to be prostituted but for many it is their destiny. Others are qualified as “escorts” or “companions” for the night or even for just an hour.  Whether we call them “whores”, “prostitutes” or “escorts” or “human traffic victims”, they are women, men and children who have less than a 3% chance of ever getting out.

I was one of them. I had to make a choice. It was either that or risk losing my sons to a brute that very easily could have killed my eldest son and myself  in a fit of rage if I weren’t able to stop him by getting custody of both my children.  Believe me; my eyes were wide-open when I stepped in the first brothel I had ever seen in my life. The devil took me by the hand then and showed me the color of money – lots of it. I could earn four-day’s pay in an hour. With that money, I could buy the services of a good lawyer and get custody of my two sons."

Source and More
http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/upcoming-book-souled-out/


Tania Fiolleau YouTube Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/savethewomen1

Vivid Entertainment, Vivid.com, Steven Hirsch wants your kids ADDICTED to Porn as Soon as Possible. Vivid Entertainment KNOWS that the quickest way to your kids is through their Superheros, their "Icons". So Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch through the eyes of Axel Braun has created an army of "Vivid Super Heros". Vivid.com is in the search engines for your children's search terms, and there it is Porn, easily accessible to your Children. STOP Vivid Entertainment from Exploiting your Children.

Vivid Super Heros look just like the regular Superhero Icons of Marvel Comics and DC Comics. The only difference is they get naked and have sex, aKa Porn. 

The movies are very digitally detailed, thanks to the STOLEN iViewit VideoTechnology and it would be hard for a child to tell the difference really, in many scenes.

Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch, Vivid SuperXXHeroes, along with Porn Parody Director Axel Braun and his Parody Films have made porn a mainstream part of your child, teens life, by getting into the search engines for their favorite action figures / super heros and by mixing PORN under the name Porn Parody with Marvel Comics, DC Comics, and Superheros.

Guess who PROFITS from Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch's Vivid Super Heros, Porn Parody Movies, targeting your children?

Where there is money and kids, there is Definitely DISNEY Right?

How about Videos, Movies, Money and Kids, well then there is ALWAYS Warner Bros. Right?

Warner Bros.,Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings (John C. Malone and Sirius Radio), Disney, and Marvel Comics ARE making money for ever second that these Porn Parodies are viewed. The Motto seems to be Get Em' Addicted to Porn at a Very Young Age.

Warner Bros.,Time Warner Inc. KNOW that the video technology used in their online media, and in these Porn Parodies of Vivid Entertainment, is STOLEN from a company called iViewit Technology and an Inventor Named Eliot Bernstein.  Yet they FAIL to Disclose this to Shareholder, year after year.

What is important is Vivid Everywhere. according to Vivid CEO Steven Hirsch, And Fox Business News is promoting this. Folks VIVID XXX Parody Films is directed at children and teens, and it is PORN.
Here is the Fox News Video.
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2229056953001/vivid-ceo-on-revolution-in-porn/?playlist_id=2226098883001

Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch, Says WHATS Important is VIVID Everywhere, oh and NO Condoms is VERY IMPORTANT. As Steven Hirsch, Vivid.com, VividTV, Vivid Touch, fought hard and with lots of money to keep those condoms off.
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/01/porn_condom_lawsuit_steven_hirsch_vivid_fsc_ahf_kayden_kross_logan_pierce.php

a Bit more on Porn Joker Steven Hirsch and the whole NO On Condoms Fight
http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/?s=Steven+Hirsch&x=-1275&y=-1239

VIVID Everywhere is VERY Important says, Steven Hirsch of Vivid Entertainment.
So VividTV, Vivid Radio, and Video Touch for your Web Browser, to Get Off Quick.
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2229056953001/vivid-ceo-on-revolution-in-porn/?playlist_id=2226098883001

Thank Larry Flynt for making Porn a Legitimate Industry, says the Fox News Reporter?  Does this woman know how to Read? Free Speech is Important, PORN Parody and Superhero PORN Is NOT.

Vivid Licenses out its BRAND to Vodka, Gentleman's Club's, Condoms, Vivid Radio, Snowboards, T-Shirts, VividTV, Vivid on Demand, and all of it USING Parody, using trademarks and copyrights of movies and action figures you and your children know well, aKa "trusted brands", yet it is PORN, and Warner Bros.,Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings (John C. Malone and Sirius Radio), Disney, and Marvel Comics must be making money for ever second that these Vivid Parody Movies are viewed.

Vivid Radio will be Satelite Radio, gee wonder if Sirius Radio / Liberty Media Holdings will make some more PORN Money from that one. 

Commercially Profiting from major trademark's, copyrights and brands and paying no Royalty or Licensing Fee? How can that be, they must be paying a fee, right? And Vivid Licensing re-licenses? Porn Attorneys such as the Riddler, (Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group) would be suing companies such as Vivid Entertainment for infringement if they had no license, right? 

Riddler Randazza wants us to believe that Marc J. Randazza is a household name, in his SLAPP suit against Blogger Crystal Cox, Randazza V. Cox, and that he has rights to his alleged brand, yet Superman, Spider-man, the Hulk, Batman and other Superhero Icons who really are a household name are somehow not under copyright or trademark laws?

Naaa, you know that Warner Bros.,Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings (John C. Malone and Sirius Radio), Disney, and Marvel Comics ARE making money for ever second that these Porn Parodies are viewed. YES Superheros having Sex, and who is this marketed to? Children and Teens Right? I mean, come on, how many ADULT actually are sexually aroused by watching Superheros have Sex?

If Porn is pirated by the little guys, Liberty Media Holdings hires copyright TROLL attorneys Marc J. Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy, Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group and Jordan Rushie of Mulvihill & Rushie LLC to go after alleged copyrights of those who download Porn movies from their sites. Law Firms such as Randazza Legal Group and Mulvihill & Rushie LLC are down right aggressive and dangerous in these legal cases, where they act outside of the law and behave in a manner that I, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox say, is down right Criminal Endangerment.

Yet, Judges such as District of Nevada's Gloria Navarro, SEEM to aid and abet these porn industry attorney thugs who really are gang stalking and internet mobbing to intimidate those they are in legal case with in order to pressure a settlement, upon my knowledge and belief, and to SILENCE Porn Industry Insiders, blowing the whistle on them.  Yet Mulvihill & Rushie Law Firm and Randazza Legal Group Support Manwin in doing this same thing, pirating porn, because Manwin is a Bully, a Mogul.   AND to "BIG" to Fail.

The Ultimate in Porn Piracy Irony is

 the FACT that Companies such as Vivid Entertainment, Liberty Media Holdings, Corbin Fisher, New Frontier Media, Manwin, Digital Playground, Brazzers, Reality Kings, Adam & Eve, Hustler and New Frontier Media PROFIT from the iViewit Technology's Video Coding Technology and the INVENTORS never got rights to their invention nor profited. Yet Liberty Media Holdings via Marc J. Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy, Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group and Jordan Rushie of Mulvihill & Rushie LLC seems to be suing someone ALL the TIME for copyright infringement, piracy, stealing their content, that they don't actually own the licensing from iViewit to the Technology their videos us.  Yet we have this FOX Business News Video talking about Manwin and the Mega-Millions made from Manwin's Porn Piracy and this seems to be Legal? Talk about Hypocrisy.

Liberty Media Holdings and Manwin Do not even have the licensing right to the video technology yet they SUE others over infringement constantly?

The Fox Business News video talks of BIG money made from Manwin by allegedly stealing videos and then profiting from advertising. YET a JUDGE gave Manwin an unconstitutional, unlawful preliminary injunction to steal the domain name ManwinSucks.com from Nicholas Bulgin in Manwin Licensing International Sarl v. Nicholas Bulgin.

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/01/chill-free-speech-first-amendment-legal.html

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html

Here is the Fox News Video
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2228731858001/wall-street-meets-the-porn-industry/?playlist_id=2226098883001

Manwin Controls Playboy's Online Properties Right? Why is Manwin seemingly above the Law?

So how does Steven Hirsch's Vivid Entertainment Porn Parody get away with OBVIOUS Copyright Infringement or Disney and Warner Bros. profiting from PORN directed at teens and young adults?

Vivid.com's Disclaimer on Superman vs. Spider Man XXX; "a Porn Parody is a a Parody Movie. This movie is not sponsored, endorsed by, or affiliated with any entity owning the rights to the characters parodied. Specifically this movie is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Comunications Inc., E.C. Publication Inc., or Marvel Characters Inc."

Sidenote: Why is MarcRandazzaParody.com a Trademark and simply stolen by Porn Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, through a Preliminary Injunction granted by Judge Gloria Misogynist Navarro? ( a Parody)

So Does Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch pay a licensing fee for Superman, Batman, Spiderman, the Joker, Pee Wee Herman, Supergirl, the Avengers, the Incredible Hulk, Star Wars?

So if Vivid Entertainment Porn Parody is not sponsored, endorsed by, or affiliated with any entity owning the rights to the characters parodied,  Superman vs. Spider Man XXX specifically in this example, and therefore Vivid Entertainment Porn Parody is SPECIFICALLY not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Comunications Inc., E.C. Publication Inc., or Marvel Characters Inc., then is there a licensing fee by Warner Bros., Disney who owns Marvel Comics, Time Warner Inc. who owns DC Comics ? What does Michael Eisner of Disney think of all this?

How Can Superman vs Spider-Man NOT be 

affiliated with SUPERMAN and Spider-MAN?

Vivid Entertainment makes big money from Porn Parody, using Warner Bros.,Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media, Disney, Marvel Comics copyright owned Superhero Icons, and yet Liberty Media Holding part owner of Time Warner hires thug attorneys such as Marc J. Randazza, J. Malcom Devoy, Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group AND Jordan Rushie of Mulvihill & Rushie LLC to go after alleged copyrights of the "little guy"? Really? Something Fishy There.

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox says Porn Parody is abusing the courts, corrupting our youth, making a mockery of children's idles, infringing on iViewit Technology and profiting from schemes with big media companies such as Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media, Disney, Marvel Comics, and yes John C. Malone of Liberty Media and Jeff Sewell of Time Warner Inc. KNOW.

So who owns the Copyright to SUPERMAN, and Must Profit from 

Superman vs. Spider Man XXX?  

Well Time Warner Inc. (TWX) has a copyright on Superman, Porn Mogul Liberty Media Holdings John C. Malone owns part of Time Warner Inc. TWC, Time Warner Inc. is using STOLEN Technology on their Videos.  Even thought Time Warner Inc. TWC had contracts and NDA's with the Inventors. (See Bottom of Post for Lot's More Details).

Recently the Heirs to the creator Superman were in a legal scuffle with Time Warner, DC Comics, Warner Bros. Regarding the Superman Copyright.

Time Warner Inc. (TWX) WON Rights to Superman

"If it’s proven there is a valid contract that can be enforced, Larson would immediately get a $20 million payment in exchange for her father’s share in some of the earliest Superman stories, Time Warner lawyer Dan Petrocelli said during arguments before the appeals court in November."

"An heir to one of Superman’s creators lost a court ruling to Time Warner Inc. (TWX) in her bid to reclaim the rights to the film and comic book hero.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco today said all the elements necessary for formation of a binding agreement were present in a 2001 letter from Laura Siegel Larson’s lawyer to Time Warner’s DC Comics unit. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-11/superman-creator-s-heir-loses-ruling-to-time-warner-over-rights.html

 U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright - Time Warner lawyer Dan Petrocelli

Warner Bros. has Committed Massive Shareholder Fraud over iViewit,
yet, WOW, wins the Rights to Superman and Royalties Axel Braun's Parody Porn? 

"Warner Bros. Wins ‘Superman’ Copyright Case Against Joe Shuster’s Heirs"
http://screenrant.com/superman-copyright-lawsuit-shuster-warner-bros-wins/

So it sure seems safe to say that anyone using SUPERMAN in a movie, a parody, or say PORN, would have to pay a royalty, a licensing fee to Time Warner Right, maybe even to Columbia Pictures as well and BIG Bucks for Mr. John C. Malone. Parody Porn KING.

Oh and that all connects to SONY right, and good ol' John Calkins formerly of Warner Bros., who was, I believe, at McKinsey and Company and is connected to John Malone in a "few" ways.

"An heir to one of Superman’s creators lost a court ruling to Time Warner Inc. (TWX) in her bid to reclaim the rights to the film and comic book hero. The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco today said all the elements necessary for formation of a binding agreement were present in a 2001 letter from Laura Siegel Larson’s lawyer to Time Warner’s DC Comics unit. The court reversed a 2008 finding by a lower-court judge in favor of Larson, whose father, Jerome, conjured the superhero with Joseph Shuster in the 1930s."

"The three-judge panel returned the case to U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II in Los Angeles with instructions to reconsider his earlier findings."

Source
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-11/superman-creator-s-heir-loses-ruling-to-time-warner-over-rights.html

What is the Real Role of Judge Otis D. Wright and the Porn Industry, is he Pro Porn or against. I mean love the Prenda Law smack down, however, something seems fishy.

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/investigative-blogger-crystal-l-cox_12.html

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/the-porn-industry-should-not-be-above.html

Does DC Comics and Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc. and Liberty Media Holdings have to pay the Siegel heirs for Superman PORN Parody? There is probably more money made over the long run by Vivid.com, Vivid Entertainment from SUPERMAN then the actual superman movies.

A new Superman film is scheduled be released by Warner Bros. on June 14, 2013, guess more Porn Parody will come after that.

Porn Rules the Economy and the earlier Your kids, You, interested in Porn, the more money the Porn Companies Make.

Marc J. Randazza, Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group SUES Eliot Bernstein iViewit Technology Inventor and Blogger Crystal Cox for sites such as MarcRandazzaParody.com, RandazzaLegalGroupSucks.com, MarcRandazzaIsAlyingAsshole.com and other "Parody" sites, see those INFRINGE on Marc Randazza's Imaginary Trademark.  Yet Marc Randazza Defends Liberty Media as they infringe on the iViewit Technology and SUE those they lure into their sites, their PORN. And now that Marc Randazza has stolen my Parody Sites about him, he has set a dangerous precedence for the Big Boys like Steven Hirshch and Vivid Entertainment, Vivid.com.

Let's Talk Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF
and Vivid Entertainment

EFF.org is linked from the Homepage of Vivid.com.  EFF obviously Supports the Porn Industry being Free Speech Rights and ALL. Yet in the case of Crystal Cox, me, an Investigative Blogger SUED by a First Amendment Attorney (Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group) in what is obviously a Chill Speech Threat, Free Speech Threat, SLAPP Lawsuit, Randazza v. Cox, EFF ignores the case ENTIRELY. EFF Loves Marc Randazza and once filed a Support Amicus Brief for the Crystal Cox Case. So why Ignore Marc Randazza V. Crystal Cox and the damage to Free Speech being done?

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-pro-se.html

The Facts, Laws, and Constitution is clear, so why is EFF standing back and letting Marc J. Randazza SUPPRESS Free Speech and Violate the fights of a Blogger they momentarily supported? Does EFF think I am guilt of Extortion, as Marc Randazza Defames About, then does that mean the First Amendment Does not apply to me?

Hmmm.. I think EFF is simply standing with their school yard buddy / bully Marc Randazza, and standing by while he ruins a bloggers life, endangers her and her sources and threatens free speech with his unconstitutional motions, preliminary injunctions and behavior in Marc Randazza V. Crystal Cox .

EFF Amicus Brief in Support of Crystal Cox
http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2012-01-11-EFF%20Amicus%20in%20Support%20of%20Cox%20Motion%20for%20New%20Trial.pdf

So who at  Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF support porn, profits from porn and why does  Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF stand with Porn Attorney Marc Randazza over the rights of an Independent Blogger, a Victim of Marc Randazza, a Citizen Journalist and a woman that is about to set a precedence that will HELP / Support / Stand for ALL that  Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF is suppose to be about?

EFF Board of Directors

Jonathan Zittrain
Brad Templeton
Pamela Samuelson
Brewster Kahle
John Gilmore
David Farber
Lorrie Faith Cranor
John Buckman
Brian Behlendorf
John Perry Barlow - Co-Founder of EFF
David Sobel
Matt Zimmerman

EFF Advisory Board

Andrew Bridges
Ryan Calo
Michael Froomkin
Michael Geist
James Gosling
Joseph Gratz
Jim Griffin
David Hayes
Bernt Hugenholtz
Mitch Kapor
Mark Lemley
Joe McNamee
Eben Moglen
Tom Moore
Deirdre Mulligan
Craig Newmark Craig Newmark is the founder of craigslist.org,
Michael Page
Abigail Phillips
Bruce Schneier
Barbara Simons
Daniel J. Solove
Michael Traynor
Jim Tyre
Richard R. Wiebe
Ethan Zuckerman

Source of Above Information
https://www.eff.org/about/staff

Porn Industry Whistle Blower News

http://www.stopsupportingporn.com/

If you don't want your children giving out information to these data mining Porn Parody companies, such as Vivid Entertainment who is after your kids, you can always get "BeNetSafe" from Brad Weber, Formerly of New Frontier Media ( a Major Porn Media Company). Just kidding, (Sarcasm, Parody).

I say that Brad Weber still makes money from the porn industry and that his software has the potential to gather data for the Porn Companies, in the name of protecting your kids. I, say the only way to protect your kids is to actually be in their life and explain to them how things of this world real work. Including a spiritual guidance of some sort, and the facts of life in the modern Internet World.  I would not trust companies such as Bradley Weber's "BeNetSafe", especially with his background. More about who is Brad Weber at Link Below.
http://www.josephrakofsky.com/2013/03/brad-weber-benetsafe-bradley-weber-brad.html

More Regarding New Frontier Media
http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/new-frontier-media-inc-noof-former-ceo.html

Check Out the Parody PORN site Vivid.com, Warn your Children before they find it on their own.  Trust NO Software to Parent your Children.

Liberty Media Holding NAMED as a Defendant in a MAJOR RICO / Racketeering Case out of the District of Nevada and Does Not Respond.

Rich Baer, Liberty Media Corporation General Counsel,KNOWS full well of the SCANDAL caused by Liberty Media Attorney Marc J. Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy, Ronald Green and Jordan Rushie. Rich Baer, Liberty Media Corporation KNOWS of a District of Nevada Lawsuit naming John C. Malone and Liberty Media, yet Rich Baer sits and waits, on the wrong side of justice and certainly the wrong side of the moral compass.

Here is District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF Defamation, Harassment, RICO, Racketeering, Anti-Trust and more.. Lawsuit filed by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case

Warner Bros., AOL, Time Warner Inc. had Agreements with iViewit

Warner Bros. Signed Agreements with iViewit Inventors

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf

Warner Bros. igned and Violated Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf

http://jeffreybewkes.blogspot.com/2010/10/sec-complaint-against-time-warner.html
Keep in mind that Philip Falcone's company Lightsquared's General Counsel was formerly the Time Warner Inc. General Counsel, and KNOWS of massive shareholder fraud at Time Warner which he FAILED to Disclose.

More Regarding Curtis Lu, then Time Warner Inc. General Counsel and Former Fannie Mae General Counsel.

http://curtislublog.blogspot.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-time-warner-incunder.html

http://jeffreybewkes.blogspot.com/2010/04/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html

http://curtislublog.blogspot.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html

http://curtislublog.blogspot.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-time-warner-inc-general.html
Eliot Bernstein Conversation with Time Warner Inc. General Counsel Curtis Lu.


More On iViewit, Time Warner, Warner Bros. and Shareholder Fraud and Deceiit

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=498

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EHvwkpj4Mn9l-P4LlOOutpD_MTmxOjgFKCgtZJiPSbw/edit?hl=en


John Calkins, Warner Bros., iViewit
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf


Doug Chey of HP, Formerly of SONY

http://douglaschey.blogspot.com/

http://douglaschey.blogspot.com/2011/02/douglas-chey-hp-formerly-of-sony-acts.html

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf


iViewit Documents

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence


Links to More on the Iviewit - Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., Jeffrey Bewkes, Curtis Lu and AOL Connection.

http://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
SEC Complaint

http://www.iviewit.tv/
iViewit Website

http://www.deniedpatent.com/
My Blog on the Iviewit Stolen Patent

http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/01/letter-from-aol-time-warner-regarding.html
David Colter Emails, John Caulkins Emails, Chuck Dages, and Alan Bell

http://www.deniedpatent.com/search/label/Warner%20Bros.
Warner Bros. Posts on my Iviewit Blog

Links from Iviewit Web Page about Warner Bros.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/colter%20letter%20to%20Calkins.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2004%2011%20-%20Rubenstein%20repsonse%20KRANE%20CONFLICT%20AUTHORED%20to%20N.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/proskauer%20client%20infringers.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf

http://www.iviewit.info/

Vivid Entertainment Steven Alan Hirsch Fought hard to try and stop a BAN on Porn Stars wearing condoms, kind of sick isn't it.  Manwin put in big money to the FIGHT to STOP a Ban on Condoms in L.A. Porn too. These "Big Boys" of Porn willsoon be moving out of Porn Valley, to avoid the Condom Ban.

Marc J. Randazza and the Randazza Legal GROUP Porn SCUM Attorneys WANT Porn to Move to Las Vegas and cozy up to him and his Judges.

Manwin Fights to STOP Condom Ban

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/26/measure-b-condoms-in-porn_n_2016532.html

http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/?p=3160

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ahf-manwin-porn-ceo-bankrolled-223200293.html

Manwin Funded by Wall Street Investors

http://www.aribass.com/2013/03/manwin-enterprises-is-involved-in-gang.html


More about Manwin ( Also Note Manwin is Manseth, Fabian Thylmann)
http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/?s=manwin&x=-1275&y=-1239

http://manwinexposed.blogspot.com/

http://business.avn.com/articles/legal/Jules-Jordan-Sues-Manwin-Scott-Justice-for-5-Million-472659.html

http://gramponante.com/news-commentary-manwin-buys-itself-by-accident/

http://icannwiki.com/index.php/Manwin_Licensing

Steven Hirsch Research Links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Hirsch

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/ceos/steven-hirsch-net-worth/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1088503/

http://www.tmz.com/person/steve-hirsch/


Vivid.com Research Links (Owned and Operated by Jovita Corporation Limited)

Vivid.com - DNC Holdings

Jovita Corporation Limited ~ a Shell Company?
Wonder if Reverse Shell Company Specialist Ari Bass / Michael Whiteacre helped on this one.

Vivid Servers
 Georgia, Marietta, United States

Jovita Corporation Limited
Susan Mary Hollyman - Director

http://www.cdrex.com/jovita-corporation-limited-8105475.html

"Jovita Corporation Limited is an Active, non trading business incorporated in England & Wales on 14th September 2011.  Their business activity is recorded as Dormant Company.  Jovita Corporation Limited is run by 1 current members. 1 shareholders own the total shares within the company. It is not part of a group.  The company has not yet filed accounts.  Jovita Corporation Limited's risk score was amended on 23/07/2012."

Source
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07774031


Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes 
(Buddies with John C. Malone, Liberty Media Holdings)

http://jeffreybewkes.blogspot.com/

http://jeffreybewkes.blogspot.com/2011/03/time-warners-ceo-jeff-bewkes-is-proven.html

Axel Braun, Will Ryder,Jovita Corporation Limited, Steven Hirsch, Vivid Entertainment LLC, Disney, Time Warner Inc, Liberty Holdings Media, Warner Bros., Jeffrey Bewkes, and more make money from using SUPERMAN in Porn Parody and who gets paid for the licensing of the "Trademark", "Copyright" Superman? Well it makes sense that Liberty Media Holdings, John C. Malone gets paid as he owns part of Time Warner Inc., who had contracts with iViewit Technology that they did not HONOR. Time to Set things Right.

More Coming Soon on all parts of this post.
Have a Tip?  Crystal@CrystalCox.com or SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Time to Expose the "Joker" Steven Hirsch, and the Riddler of Gotham, Supervillian Rabid Riddler Randazza AND  Superheros are Archangel Eliot Bernstein ( Batman ), Angel Alexandra Mayers  (Cat Woman), and Captain Crystal Cox (aKa Superman / Priestess Combo) are just the Superheros for the Job.  ~ Stay Tuned for the next Parody of Corruption by Corruption Comedian, Crazy Crystal Cox, the Mad Dog Blogger of Anti-Corruption Media EXPOSING Evil.

Manwin Enterprises is involved in Gang Stalking and More. Wall Street Meets the Porn Industry. Manwin and Goldman Sachs. Jason Colodne and Jason Beckman Colbeck Capital Source.

Manwin Enterprises is involved in Gang Stalking and More. Wall Street Meets the Porn Industry. Manwin and Goldman Sachs. Manwin Received 167 Million in Financing From Colbeck Capital Source. Stealing Porn and Monetizing It?

Colbeck Capital Source Funding Manwin Porn Pirating. 

Charlie Gasparino, Fox Business news on the pirating of porn, and No crackdown of Copyright in Porn?  Check out this Video, Wall Street inevitably invests in Porn. PORN Rules the Economy.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2228731858001/wall-street-meets-the-porn-industry/?playlist_id=2226098883001

Also check out Major RICO, Racketeering, Defamation, Hate Crime, Harassment Allegations NAMING Manwin, by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case

For more on the Topic of the First Amendment and Investigative Bloggers as it relates to the Crystal Cox Case, Now on Appeal at the Ninth Circuit

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/does-portland-oregon-judge-have-legal.html

For more on the Very Important issues of the Crystal Cox Case, and ENDING the Monopoly Big Media has on Free Speech Once and For All, Check Out

CrystalCoxCase.com

Porn Industry Whistle Blower News
http://www.stopsupportingporn.com/

Colbeck Capital Source Research Links

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-05-29/entertainment/sns-201205291723reedbusivarietynvr1118054744-20120529_1_relativity-media-ryan-kavanaugh-new-funds

"Colbeck Capital Management, LLP is an investment manager focusing on credit opportunities including distressed debt, strategic lending and other fundamental, value based and event driven investments. 

Colbeck was formed by Jason Colodne and Jason Beckman, who previously worked together sourcing and investing in distressed credit at Goldman Sachs. Colbeck built an institutional investing platform with a robust, proprietary infrastructure and has partnered with the best-in-class service providers. 

Colbeck is currently comprised of a team of six including four investment professionals who have worked together at Goldman Sachs, Soros and/or graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton and a Chief Operating and Financial Officer."

Source
http://www.linkedin.com/company/colbeck-capital-management-llc

Big Media is NOT the Voice of the "People". Investigative Bloggers WORLDWIDE are the Voice of the People. Traditional Journalist SHOULD not Have More Protection Under the Law then Investigative Bloggers.

News is NOT about Calling Both Sides and Asking if they Did It.

News is not about Ethics and Standards, it's about what Really Happened.

News is BIASED if it is Factual.

Laws that Apply to BIG Media News Reporters are laws of the United States, and they SHOULD be equal to all who report the news, whatever that news may be. Traditional Journalists should have no greater right to be protected under the law than Investigative Bloggers.

The Constitution Applies to ALL Citizens, not simply Investigative Bloggers, not JUST Traditional Journalists, and not just Attorneys. ALL "We the PEOPLE".

The AP Wire Service is the Real "Google Bomber". They take a piece of a story and make it World News, factual or not and the laws that protect them to do this, do not protect TRUE Independent Media, True Free Press, and REAL NEWS, which in today's age is coming from Investigative Bloggers.

Main Stream Media should not have a Monopoly on Free Speech. 

Main Stream Media is Agenda Based, Ad Dollar Based and works for the Banks, Corporations and to control the masses with versions of reality that are not the whole truth and nothing but. Big Media is NOT reporting the news, they are Entertainment News, and feed advertisers, politics and the corporate machine. Investigative Bloggers are the Real News.

Investigative Bloggers are passionate about the story and really investigate, research, read documents, watch videos, talk to multiple parties AND they don't simply call both sides, act unbiased and publish something neutral that has no substance. THAT is NOT the NEWS.

Investigative Bloggers bring you stories they have seen, heard first hand, or researched extensively vs calling both sides. Stories that traditional Journalist cannot bring you, they fear losing their jobs, and must remain UNBIASED and without "Opinion" or really giving the information to the public with deep facts, documents, details, PROOF.

Investigative Bloggers, are for the most part, BIASED, they have to be, as they know the TRUTH of the Story, and with the true knowledge of the facts and events that REALLY happened, comes bias.

Main Stream Media gets an article from one AP reporter, his or her version of the story, the way they heard it, and most likely a calling of both sides to ask their version of reality. This is not the real story, not the deep facts, no document proof, and no real news. Yet they run the story in every newspaper and AP connected publication worldwide, they put my face on the news, and they regurgitate that same story and NONE of them do independent research. They all listen to one person and they "Google Bomb" the world with that persons perception of the news story or event. I would rather each reporter gave me a BIASED Opinion then to simply regurgitate someone else's story. Or maybe each news office, tv station, news reporter could actual READ the documents, watch the videos, listen to hearing, and ACTUALLY report the news, even if biased, that is the news I would rather have delivered to me. Investigative Bloggers do that. Main Stream Media, the AP, TV News DOES NOT DO THAT.

Main Stream Media, Traditional Media, Traditional Journalists, Traditional Reporters ARE not bringing you the REAL NEWS, the Real Story, the Real Events, the FACT. They Cannot Afford To. Independent News, Free Press, Alternative News VIA Investigative Bloggers ARE bringing you the Real News and Investigative Bloggers SHOULD have Equal Protection under the Law.

Investigative Bloggers Unite

I, Crystal L. Cox, am Not a Journalist, I do not want to Be.  I did not CLAIM TO BE a Journalist in the Traditional Media Sense of the Word "Journalist", in which they seem to feel they own. I am not a Traditional News Reporter, I do not wish to be. I am an Investigative Blogger, and what I want is equal protection under the law for ALL Investigative Blogger. AND that is what I am Fighting For, what I persist for, and why I refuse EVERY settlement offer.


I do not want to be accepted by Traditional Media / Journalists / Reporters, approved of by them, taken in as one of their own. I am an  Investigative Blogger, I am TRULY Independent. No one controls me, edits me, censors me. I bring you independent thought and news from my own research and those I deem newsworthy. Take it or Leave It.

I am not Traditional Media, nor am I trying to be.  I am Alternative News, Alternative Media, News of the People, By the People, FOR THE PEOPLE.   I do not answer to the alleged standards of practice, ethics, bias, mirage of rules, that traditional media has the courts believing is what gives them a higher degree of protection under the law then and  Investigative Blogger.  I am one woman, doing what I can to make the world a better place by giving top of the search engine voice to victims of corruption in the courts of America.

 Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox was not Protecting A Source. 

Classic Case of Media GONE Rampant with misinformation. There was no secret source, nor source I was protecting. Yet the entire world, the wire service run rampant claimed that I was protecting a source and therefore wanted to use the Shield Law, and it would not have protected me anyway Blogger or Traditional Media Reporter Simply Not True.

My source was known for 3 years by the Plaintiff and His Attorney for Several Years before they sued me. I was not refusing to give up a source.

Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger wanted Oregon Retraction Laws to Apply to her case. The Plaintiff and his attorney sued me, Crystal Cox, to retaliate against me and silence me regarding a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy they were both involved in. Neither asked for a Retraction before they sued a Blogger for 10 Million Dollars. A Blogger who they knew was reporting on them for over 3 years before they sued her. They did not bother to ask for a retraction of a blog post before, what is now well into the third year of legal battles, courts time and expense and massive damage. It is the law to ask for a retraction, yet the Judge in my case said Oregon Retraction Laws did not apply to me because I was a Blogger. This was not correct, not lawful and certainly not constitutional.

This same Oregon Judge, Judge Marco Hernandez RULED that the First Amendment Does not apply to me because I am not a Journalist associated with a known media.

The First Amendment does apply to Crystal L. Cox as a Citizen of the United States, and as an Investigative Bloggers, Equal yet very different roles. The First Amendment APPLIES to ALL.

I wanted to protect massive amounts of eMails from sources under the Shield Law, not their identity. I wanted to Actual Malice to apply to my case. The story is not how it is portrayed. Mass media and bloggers read the Seattle Weekly article and formed their story, their news from that one story, without reading Trial Documents or finding the FACTS.

Judge Marco Hernandez DENIED me a new trial, seemingly on what he believed as to me having no standards or ethics and seemingly guilty of Extortion. Yet I was not on trial for extortion, so how did this factor into my case. Standards and Ethics and are NOT LAW, so how was that a factor in my case?  If a Federal Judge thought I extorted those 2 Attorneys who claimed I did, (Marc J. Randazza and David S. Aman) then why not a federal investigation, a criminal trial, instead of using that as a NEW reason why I am not allowed, as a blogger, equal protection under the law as a journalist because he thinks I have no standards, ethics, and am a criminal.

See folks, If I am Convicted of a Crime, say Bank Robbery, and I get a prison citizen for this Felony, am I then without First Amendment Rights? Am I then not protected with equal rights as traditional journalists in my my online reporting? Is it even related at all?

Come on, are their no JOURNALISTS who are Also Felons? Makes No Sense.

Extortion was no Part of the Crystal Cox Case, Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox. The Plaintiff's Attorney David S. Aman, in conjunction with the New York Times Reporter David Carr, Forbes Reporter Kashmir Hill, NPR Reporter Bob Garfield, First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza, and other alleged conspirators, simply defamed Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox to teach me a lesson, to intimidate me into stopping my Ninth Circuit Appeal, and to attempt to discredit the corruption stories I was and am exposing on my Anti-Corruption Media / Whistleblower Media Blog Network. There was no Extortion, there was no Extortion investigation, trial, or criminal complaint.

For more on the Topic of the First Amendment and Investigative Bloggers as it relates to the Crystal Cox Case, Now on Appeal at the Ninth Circuit

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/03/does-portland-oregon-judge-have-legal.html


For more on the Very Important issues of the Crystal Cox Case, and ENDING the Monopoly Big Media has on Free Speech Once and For All, Check Out

CrystalCoxCase.com

Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox WANTS equal protection for Investigative Bloggers and Traditional Journalists under the Law. Blogger Crystal Cox WANTS equal protection under the Constitution for ALL Citizens.

"Crystal Cox considers herself an investigative journalist, but her only outlets are the websites she's created to write about legal issues. In one of many blog posts she wrote about Obsidian Finance Group (an Oregon firm), she was critical of the company and called its co-founder a "thug" and a "liar." When Obsidian sued her, she said she had an inside source that backed her allegations. She tried to use Oregon's shield law — which protects journalists from revealing their sources — to protect her, but the judge found that Cox was indeed not a journalist and, as such, could not be protected by the shield law.

Cox, who represented herself, also argued that Obsidian's claim was unfounded because they never asked her for a retraction. Under Oregon's retraction law, a defamation case cannot go forward unless the person who claims to have been defamed has first asked for a retraction or correction and not received it, but that law only applies to printed or broadcast material.

A federal judge ruled (pdf) against Cox's legal arguments. The ruling requires her to pay The jury in the case required her to pay $2.5 million in damages. The case has made international news and has reinvigorated the question of whether bloggers are journalists. Should bloggers be protected by the same laws that protect traditional journalists?

In a world where more and more news is found online, how can those lines be drawn? What punishment, if any, should Cox — and bloggers like her — face for defaming someone? Should traditional journalistic standards apply to everyone who writes a story online?"

Source of Post

http://www.opb.org/thinkoutloud/shows/blogger-journalist/

Listen to the Audio for more Debate on the Topic.

Also please Note, I never had a Secret Source. The Seattle Weekly ran with that in December of 2011, and its' not factual. My sources were revealed for years when I went to trial. Plus I took over 500 pages of proof of source.

And to this day, I believe Kevin Padrick broke bankruptcy law and was in breach of contract with the Summit Principals and that this severely harmed the Creditors and Investors of the Summit Bankruptcy. Kevin Padrick has been accused of these same activities in objections to his fees in other bankruptcy cases as well, do your homework if you really want to know. 

Kevin Padrick's actions harmed his OWN reputation, however he still signed massive wattage agreements and got multi-million dollar deals, and continues to. I did not harm his reputation, his own actions did. FIND THE FACTS. .. Read the Documents, Listen to hearing Audios, Read Depositions, Watch Videos, Read Billing Receipts, Read Court Orders, Read Contracts,  Read internal eMails, and make an educated decision on the facts. If you don't want to do this, then is it really "impartial", "fair" to simply assume I am the bad guy, because a Jury was instructed to not apply any laws to me nor the first amendment?